TUTURAN INTEROGATIF PENGACARA DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SURABAYA

DAMAYANTI, ALFIA (2023) TUTURAN INTEROGATIF PENGACARA DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SURABAYA. Skripsi thesis, UNIVERSITAS PGRI ADI BUANA SURABAYA.

[thumbnail of ABSTRAK.pdf] Text
ABSTRAK.pdf

Download (191kB)
[thumbnail of BAB I.pdf] Text
BAB I.pdf

Download (391kB)
[thumbnail of DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf] Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf

Download (416kB)
[thumbnail of LAMPIRAN.pdf] Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf

Download (2MB)
[thumbnail of HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf] Text
HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf

Download (675kB)

Abstract

Kata kunci : pragmatik, tindak tutur, tuturan interogatif
Pragmatik adalah sebuah cabang ilmu bahasa yang mempelajari tentang
keserasian pemakaian bahasa dalam hal berkomunikasi. Tindak tutur adalah sebuah
tuturan yang di dalamnya terdapat suatu tindakan, tindak tutur sendiri merupakan
bagian dari pragmatik. Tuturan interogatif adalah suatu tuturan yang mengandung
kalimat interogatif atau kalimat pertanyaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk
Mendeskripsikan penggunaan tuturan interogatif pengacara di Pengadilan Negeri
Surabaya. Dalam penelitian ini analisis data menggunakan teori tindak tutur
interogatif oleh George Yule. Fokus utama pada penelitian ini adalah jenis-jenis
tuturan interogatif yang dituturkan oleh pengacara di Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya.
Data yang digunakan untuk keperluan ppenelitian ini dikumpulkan dari dokumen
lisan berupa rekaman tuturan pengacara di Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya berupa kata,
frasa, klausa, dan kalimat. Sumber data yang diperoleh dari persidangan dengan
nomor kasus 1772/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Sby dan 1833/Pid.B/2022/PN Sby.
Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan cara observasi ke lapangan, merekam semua
tuturan dalam persidangan, menyimak setiap tuturanyang dituturkan di persidangan,
mencatat setiap tuturan yang dituturkan oleh pengacara. Metode analisis penelitian
yang digunakan pada penelitian ini yaitu mentranskripsi data hasil rekaman,
mengidentifikasi dan mengklasifikasi data, menyalin ke dalam korpus data,
menganalisis korpus data, menyimpulkan. penganalisisan data pada penelitian ini
menggunakan teknik analisis deskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan peneliti
menemukan tiga bentuk tuturan interogatif meliputi tuturan interogatif desakan,
tuturan interogatif permintaan validasi, tuturan interogatif permintaan izin. Dua
makna pada tuturan interogatif desakan yaitu pendesakan dan pengakuan, dua
makna pada tuturan interogatif permintaan validasi yaitu persetujuan dan penjelas,
dua makna tuturan interogatif permintaan izin yaitu permohonan dan penekanan.
Simpulan pada penelitian ini tuturan interogatif dapat digunakan sebagai bahan
referensi kajian Linguistik Forensik terkait kajian pragmatik terlebih khusus pada
tuturan di dalam persidangan.
ABSTRACT
Damayanti, Alfia. 2023. Interrogative Speech of Lawyers at the Surabaya
District Court. Indonesian Language Education Study Program.
Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities. PGRI Adi Buana
University Surabaya.
Supervisor: Dr. Mimas Ardhianti, M.Pd.
Keywords: pragmatics, speech acts, interrogative utterances
Pragmatics is a branch of linguistics that studies the harmony of language
use in terms of communication. Speech act is a speech in which there is an action,
the speech act itself is part of pragmatics. Interrogative speech is an utterance that
contains interrogative sentences or question sentences. This study aims to describe
the use of lawyers' interrogative speech at the Surabaya District Court. In this study,
data analysis uses the theory of interrogative speech acts by George Yule. The main
focus of this research is the types of interrogative utterances uttered by lawyers at
the Surabaya District Court. The data used for this research was collected from oral
documents in the form of recordings of speeches of lawyers at the Surabaya District
Court in the form of words, phrases, clauses and sentences. Sources of data
obtained from trials with case numbers 1772/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Sby and
1833/Pid.B/2022/PN Sby. Data collection was carried out by observing in the field,
recording all utterances in court, listening to every utterance uttered in court, noting
every utterance uttered by lawyers. The research analysis method used in this study
was transcribing the recorded data, identifying and classifying the data,
transcribing into the data corpus, analyzing the data corpus, concluding. analyzing
the data in this study using descriptive analysis techniques. The results of this study
indicate that the researcher found three forms of interrogative speech including
exhortation interrogative speech, interrogative speech asking for validation,
interrogative speech asking for permission. Two meanings in the interrogative
utterances of exhortation, namely insistence and acknowledgment, two meanings in
the interrogative utterances of requests for validation, namely approval and
clarification, the two meanings of interrogative utterances of requests for
permission, namely requests and emphasis. The conclusion of this study is that
interrogative utterances can be used as a reference material for Forensic Linguistic
studies related to pragmatic studies, especially in speech in court.

Item Type: Thesis (Skripsi)
Subjects: L Education > L Education (General)
L Education > LA History of education
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB1501 Primary Education
P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics
Divisions: Fakultas Keguruan (FGr) > Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia (PBI) S1
Depositing User: mrs Alfia Damayanti
Date Deposited: 31 Jul 2024 06:38
Last Modified: 31 Jul 2024 06:38
URI: https://repository.unipasby.ac.id/id/eprint/5926

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item